Free Airdrop Season 7 is LIVE! Answer fun questions or do simple tasks to earn rewards from the $30K BitDegree prize pool. Participate Now ! 🔥
Key Takeaways
Free Airdrop Season 7 is LIVE! Answer fun questions or do simple tasks to earn rewards from the $30K BitDegree prize pool. Participate Now ! 🔥
OpenAI has filed a countersuit claiming Elon Musk tried to take control of the organization through unfair tactics.
The company says it has emails showing Musk pushed for changes that would have given him control of the board and future direction.
The lawsuit focuses on a $97 billion offer that OpenAI calls fake. The group also wants money for damages and a court order to stop Musk from getting involved again.
Did you know?
Subscribe - We publish new crypto explainer videos every week!
Can Russia Use Crypto to Bypass Sanctions? (Animated)
Although Musk has said OpenAI moved away from its nonprofit goals, the group said in an April 10 post on X that he was the one who first suggested turning it into a for-profit company—if he was in charge.
According to emails included in the filing, Musk raised questions about OpenAI’s structure as early as 2015. He suggested changing it to a mix of a regular company and a nonprofit to better align goals.
In September 2017, Musk reportedly made a formal push for control. He offered funding in exchange for leadership, saying he wanted to appoint most of the board and become CEO. One email quoted him saying:
I would unequivocally have initial control of the company.
OpenAI also claims Musk had his team create a separate for-profit business called Open Artificial Intelligence Technologies, Inc. This company would hold OpenAI’s intellectual property, according to the complaint. The idea was rejected by the other founders, who said it could lead to a situation where one person had too much control.
Meanwhile, Sarah Wynn-Williams, a former Meta executive, recently planned to testify before US lawmakers about the company's behind-the-scenes dealings with Chinese officials. What are her allegations? Read the full story.
To ensure the highest level of accuracy & most up-to-date information, BitDegree.org is regularly audited & fact-checked by following strict editorial guidelines & review methodology.
Carefully selected industry experts contribute their real-life experience & expertise to BitDegree's content. Our extensive Web3 Expert Network is compiled of professionals from leading companies, research organizations and academia.